Apple UK’s “Sorry, Samsung didn’t copy the iPad design” semi-apology ad appears

By on


Apple UK has finally published that court-mandated apology saying that Samsung didn’t copy the design of the iPad after losing an appeal. The court found in October Samsung did not copy the iPad design for the Galaxy Tab 10.1, the Tab 8.9 and the Tab 7.7; and ruled that Apple had to publish an ad on its website and on almost every publication to “correct the damaging impression” that it was a copycat.

While it prints the judge’s words on how Apple’s simplicity and how Samsung are “not as cool” (very selective quotation – but at least they link to the full website), it does also cite its victories in the US and Germany in saying that Samsung are still copycats. It has that “Sorry I punched you in the face, but you deserved it” vibe to it.

Or that’s just me.

Probably it’s best you judge it for yourself. The full statement is below:

Samsung / Apple UK judgment

On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2012/1882.html.

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

“The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design.”

“The informed user’s overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool.”

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html. There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple’s design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple’s far more popular iPad.

via iMore, Apple

Join the Conversation